Clinical Features, Natural History, and Management of Pericardial Cysts

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology Vol. 123; no. 1; pp. 159 - 163
• Main Authors: Alkharabsheh, Saqer, Gentry III, James L., Khayata, Mohamed, Gupta, Neha, Schoenhagen, Paul, Flamm, Scott, Murthy, Sudish, Klein, Allan L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2019; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Computed tomography; Congenital diseases; Cysts; Dyspnea; Enlargement; Females; Heart surgery; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Natural history; NMR; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Ostomy; Pain; Patients; Studies; Variables; X-rays
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.09.009

With the increased use of medical imaging, there has been an increase in the numbers of pericardial cysts identified. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the clinical course for pericardial cysts. Hence, we aimed to study the clinical features and natural history of pericardial cysts. We retrospectively studied all patients with the diagnosis of pericardial cysts based on computed tomography (CT) chest or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) between 2008 and 2014. The maximum diameter of the cyst was measured at the initial study (CT/CMR) and was compared with the most recent follow-up imaging modality of the same type if available. A change in the maximum diameter more than 10% was considered significant. We included 103 patients in the study; 89% were asymptomatic and 67% were females. Twenty-nine asymptomatic patients had repeat imaging with the same modality (CT/CMR) with a mean follow-up of 23 months. The maximum cyst diameter decreased by a mean of 25% in 34% of the patients and increased by a mean of 13% in 17% of the patients. The remaining patients (48%) had no significant change. All 29 patients remained asymptomatic. In conclusion, most pericardial cyst cases were asymptomatic. On repeat imaging, approximately 1/3 of pericardial cysts were found to decrease in size, whereas interval enlargement was infrequent and unlikely to be clinically relevant. Therefore, within the limitations of our study, serial imaging in asymptomatic patients with CT or CMR does not appear to impact management decisions.