Is the Combination of Robot-Assisted Therapy and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Useful for Upper Limb Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Healthcare (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 3; p. 337
• Main Authors: Bernal-Jiménez, Juan J, Polonio-López, Begoña, Sanz-García, Ancor, Martín-Conty, José L, Lerín-Calvo, Alfredo, Segura-Fragoso, Antonio, Martín-Rodríguez, Francisco, Cantero-Garlito, Pablo A, Corregidor-Sánchez, Ana-Isabel, Mordillo-Mateos, Laura
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Activities of daily living; Analysis; Arm; Arms; Brain stimulation; Care and treatment; Extremities, Upper; hand dexterity; Health aspects; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meta-analysis; Methods; Physical therapy; Quality of life; Recovery (Medical); Rehabilitation; robot-assisted therapy (RAT); Robots; Spasticity; Stroke; Stroke (Disease); Systematic review; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS; upper limb recovery; Spain; robot-assisted therapy (RAT); spasticity; stroke; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); hand dexterity; upper limb recovery
• ISSN: 2227-9032; 2227-9032
• DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030337

Stroke is the third leading cause of disability in the world, and effective rehabilitation is needed to improve lost functionality post-stroke. In this regard, robot-assisted therapy (RAT) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising rehabilitative approaches that have been shown to be effective in motor recovery. In the past decade, they have been combined to study whether their combination produces adjuvant and greater effects on stroke recovery. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the combined use of RATs and tDCS in the motor recovery of the upper extremities after stroke. After reviewing 227 studies, we included nine randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in this study. We analysed the methodological quality of all nine RCTs in the meta-analysis. The analysed outcomes were deficit severity, hand dexterity, spasticity, and activity. The addition of tDCS to RAT produced a negligible additional benefit on the effects of upper limb function (SMD -0.09, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.12), hand dexterity (SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.46), spasticity (SMD 0.04, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.32), and activity (SMD 0.66, 95% CI -1.82 to 3.14). There is no evidence of an additional effect when adding tDCS to RAT for upper limb recovery after stroke. Combining tDCS with RAT does not improve upper limb motor function, spasticity, and/or hand dexterity. Future research should focus on the use of RAT protocols in which the patient is given an active role, focusing on the intensity and dosage, and determining how certain variables influence the success of RAT.