A step closer towards achieving universal health coverage: the role of gender in enrolment in health insurance in India

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 24; no. 1; p. 141
• Main Authors: Ziegler, Susanne, Srivastava, Swati, Parmar, Divya, Basu, Sharmishtha, Jain, Nishant, De Allegri, Manuela
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 26.01.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Comparative analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Demographic aspects; Employment; Expenditures; Female; Females; Gender; Gender differences; Health insurance; Health services; Households; Humans; India; Insurance coverage; Insurance, Health; Male; Maternal & child health; National health insurance; Poverty; Public health; RSBY; Sexism; Universal health coverage; Universal Health Insurance; User fees; Women; India; Health insurance; Gender; RSBY; Universal health coverage; India
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10473-z

There is limited understanding of how universal health coverage (UHC) schemes such as publicly-funded health insurance (PFHI) benefit women as compared to men. Many of these schemes are gender-neutral in design but given the existing gender inequalities in many societies, their benefits may not be similar for women and men. We contribute to the evidence by conducting a gender analysis of the enrolment of individuals and households in India's national PFHI scheme, Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY). We used data from a cross-sectional household survey on RSBY eligible families across eight Indian states and studied different outcome variables at both the individual and household levels to compare enrolment among women and men. We applied multivariate logistic regressions and controlled for several demographic and socio-economic characteristics. At the individual level, the analysis revealed no substantial differences in enrolment between men and women. Only in one state were women more likely to be enrolled in RSBY than men (AOR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.32-5.38), and this pattern was linked to their status in the household. At the household level, analyses revealed that female-headed households had a higher likelihood to be enrolled (AOR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.14-1.62), but not necessarily to have all household members enrolled. Findings are surprising in light of India's well-documented gender bias, permeating different aspects of society, and are most likely an indication of success in designing a policy that did not favour participation by men above women, by mandating spouse enrolment and securing enrolment of up to five family members. Higher enrolment rates among female-headed households are also an indication of women's preferences for investments in health, in the context of a conducive policy environment. Further analyses are needed to examine if once enrolled, women also make use of the scheme benefits to the same extent as men do. India is called upon to capitalise on the achievements of RSBY and apply them to newer schemes such as PM-JAY.