Finite element dependence of stress evaluation for human trabecular bone

• Published in: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Vol. 18; pp. 200 - 212
• Main Authors: Depalle, B., Chapurlat, R., Walter-Le-Berre, H., Bou-Saïd, B., Follet, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2013; Elsevier
• Subjects: Aged; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomedical materials; Bones; Computer simulation; Engineering Sciences; Female; Finite Element Analysis; Finite element method; Fractures, Bone; Human vertebra; Humans; Male; Mathematical analysis; Mathematical models; Mechanical engineering; Mechanical properties; Mechanics; Physics; Risk; Spine; Stress; Stress, Mechanical; Stresses; Trabecular bone; Mechanical properties; Trabecular bone; Finite element analysis; Human vertebra; Stress
• ISSN: 1751-6161; 1878-0180
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.08.012

Numerical simulation using finite element models (FEM) has become more and more suitable to estimate the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. The size and kind of elements involved in the models, however, may influence the results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of hexahedral elements formulation on the evaluation of mechanical stress applied to trabeculae bone during a compression test simulation. Trabecular bone cores were extracted from 18 L2 vertebrae (12 women and 6 men, mean age: 76±11, BV/TV=7.5±1.9%). Samples were micro-CT scanned at 20μm isotropic voxel size. Micro-CT images have been sub-sampled (20, 40 and 80μm) to create 5.6mm cubic FEM. For each sample, a compression test FEM has been created, using either 8-nodes linear hexahedral elements with full or reduced integration or 20-nodes quadratic hexahedral elements fully integrated, resulting in nine models per samples. Bone mechanical properties have been assumed isotropic, homogenous and to follow a linear elastic behavior law (Young modulus: 8GPa, Poisson ratio: 0.3). Despite micro-architecture modifications (loss of connectivity, trabeculae thickening) due to voxel size increase, apparent mechanical properties calculated with low resolution models are significantly correlated with high resolution results, no matter the element formulation. However, stress distributions are more sensitive to both resolution and element formulation modifications. With linear elements, increasing voxel size leads to an alteration of stress concentration areas due to stiffening errors. On the opposite, the use of reduced integration induces severe smoothing and underestimation of stress fields resulting in stress raisers loss. Notwithstanding their high computational cost, quadratic elements are most appropriate for stress prediction in low resolution trabecular bone FEM. These observations are dependent on trabecular bone micro-architecture, and are more significant for low density sample displaying low trabecular thickness. In conclusion, we found that element formulation is almost important as element size when evaluating trabecular bone mechanical behavior at trabeculae scale. Therefore, element type should be chosen carefully when evaluating trabecular bone behavior using FEM. [Display omitted]