The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review

• Published in: BMC health services research Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1099 - 19
• Main Authors: Keuper, Jelle, van Tuyl, Lilian H. D., de Geit, Ellemarijn, Rijpkema, Corinne, Vis, Elize, Batenburg, Ronald, Verheij, Robert
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 19.09.2024; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Citation management software; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; E-health; Efficiency; eHealth; Electronic health records; Electronic Health Records - statistics & numerical data; Family physicians; General practice; General Practice - statistics & numerical data; Humans; Impact; Influence; Medical personnel; Medical Subject Headings-MeSH; Pandemics; Physicians (General practice); Primary care; Professional relationships; Professionals; SARS-CoV-2; Services; Systematic review; Telemedicine; Telemedicine - statistics & numerical data; Text messaging; Work hours; Workload; Workload - statistics & numerical data; Workloads; Netherlands; Impact; General practice; Systematic review; eHealth; Workload
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11524-9

In recent years, eHealth has received much attention as an opportunity to increase efficiency within healthcare organizations. Adoption of eHealth might consequently help to solve perceived health workforce challenges, including labor shortages and increasing workloads among primary care professionals, who serve as the first point of contact for healthcare in many countries. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the impact of general eHealth use and specific eHealth services use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era. The databases of CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Medline ALL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched, using combinations of keywords including 'eHealth', 'workload', and 'general practice'. Data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies were independently performed by at least two reviewers. Publications were included for the period 2010 - 2020, before the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. In total, 208 studies describing the impact of eHealth services use on general practice workload were identified. We found that two eHealth services were mainly investigated within this context, namely electronic health records and digital communication services, and that the largest share of the included studies used a qualitative study design. Overall, a small majority of the studies found that eHealth led to an increase in general practice workload. However, results differed between the various types of eHealth services, as a large share of the studies also reported a reduction or no change in workload. The impact of eHealth services use on general practice workload is ambiguous. While a small majority of the effects indicated that eHealth increased workload in general practice, a large share of the effects also showed that eHealth use reduced workload or had no impact. These results do not imply a definitive conclusion, which underscores the need for further explanatory research. Various factors, including the study setting, system design, and the phase of implementation, may influence this impact and should be taken into account when general practices adopt new eHealth services. PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42020199897; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=199897 .