Early prediction of drug metabolism and toxicity: systems biology approach and modeling

Many of the drug candidates that fail in clinical trials are withdrawn because of unforeseen effects of human metabolism, such as toxicity and unfavorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Early pre-clinical elimination of such compounds is important but not yet possible. An ideal system would enable resear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDrug Discovery Today Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 127 - 135
Main Authors Bugrim, Andrej, Nikolskaya, Tatiana, Nikolsky, Yuri
Format Book Review Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2004
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Many of the drug candidates that fail in clinical trials are withdrawn because of unforeseen effects of human metabolism, such as toxicity and unfavorable pharmacokinetic profiles. Early pre-clinical elimination of such compounds is important but not yet possible. An ideal system would enable researchers to make a confident elimination decision based purely on the structure of a new compound, and incorporate and use multiple pre-clinical experimental data to support such a decision. Currently available resources can be split into three categories: (i) structure–activity relationships (SAR) computational models based on compound structure; (ii) ‘pattern’ databases of tissue or organ response to drugs, compiled from high-throughput experiments; and (iii) ‘systems biology’ databases of metabolic pathways, genes and regulatory networks. In this review, we outline the advantages and drawbacks of each of these systems and suggest directions for their integration. Pre-clinical elimination of ADME/Tox averse drug candidates is important, but not possible yet. The ideal system should allow elimination decision based on compound's structure, and utilize all pre-clinical data. Available in silico resources should be integrated in a systems biology framework.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1359-6446
1878-5832
DOI:10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02971-4