Impact of Different Types of Lymphadenectomy Combined With Different Extents of Tumor Resection on Survival Outcomes of Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Large-Cohort Real-World Study

To investigate the prognostic impact of different types of lymphadenectomy with different extents of tumor resection on the outcomes of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were classified into lobectomy and sublobectomy groups, and then each group was subdivided according to the typ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 9; p. 642
Main Authors Wang, Weidong, Chen, Dongni, Xi, Kexing, Chen, Yongqiang, Zhang, Xuewen, Wen, Yinsheng, Huang, Zirui, Yu, Xiangyang, Wang, Gongming, Zhang, Rusi, Zhang, Lanjun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 24.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To investigate the prognostic impact of different types of lymphadenectomy with different extents of tumor resection on the outcomes of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients were classified into lobectomy and sublobectomy groups, and then each group was subdivided according to the types of lymphadenectomy. The end points of the study were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Propensity score matched (PSM) comparative analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed. A total of 1,336 patients were included in the current study. Lobectomy was associated with better OS and DFS. In the lobectomy group, lobectomy with bilateral mediastinal lymphadenectomy (BML) was associated with better OS than lobectomy with systematic nodal dissection (SND) or lobe-specific systematic node dissection (L-SND). Lobectomy with SND or L-SND was associated with better OS than lobectomy with systematic nodal sampling (SNS) or selected lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Additionally, lobectomy with BML or SND was associated with better DFS than lobectomy with L-SND or SNS or SLNB. After PSM, compared with lobectomy with SNS or SLNB, lobectomy with SND resulted in more favorable OS and DFS. There was no survival difference between different types of lymphadenectomy for patients who underwent sublobectomy. A multivariable analysis revealed independent associations of lobectomy with BML or SND with better OS and DFS compared with those of lobectomy with SNS or SLNB. This study reveals an association of lobectomy with more systematic and complete lymph node dissection, such as BML or SND, with better prognosis in stage I NSCLC patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors have contributed equally to this work
Edited by: Marco Lucchi, University of Pisa, Italy
This article was submitted to Thoracic Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Reviewed by: Lorenzo Spaggiari, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia s.r.l., Italy; Mark Ragusa, University of Perugia, Italy
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2019.00642