Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change

Opportunities for innovation are created by broad restructuring processes and by the chance to be in at the start of new or substantially revised political institutions. These intuitions have animated the efforts of women's movement activists and their allies in processes of political transitio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolitics & gender Vol. 10; no. 4; pp. 549 - 571
Main Author Mackay, Fiona
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.12.2014
Subjects
Engineering
Feminism
Freedom
Gender studies
Innovation
Innovations
Political Change
Political Institutions
Political Movements
Politics
Protest Movements
Reforms
Rights
Sex
Thematic Issue on Gendering “New” Institutions
Values
Womens Rights
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Opportunities for innovation are created by broad restructuring processes and by the chance to be in at the start of new or substantially revised political institutions. These intuitions have animated the efforts of women's movement activists and their allies in processes of political transition and constitutional or institutional “engineering” (and reengineering) with the aim of embedding gender rights and freedoms (Banaszak, Beckwith, and Rucht 2003; Dobrowolsky and Hart 2003). Institutional theory supports these intuitions. Reformers—including feminist change agents—may take advantage of the “permissive” stage of institutional creation. By successfully intervening to insert new actors, new values, and new rules into new institutions, reformers may profoundly influence the future developments of an institution (Goodin 1996; Pierson 2004). By “locking in” elements that promote gender equality and gender justice at the stage of institutional design, the goal is to set off fledgling institutions along progressive paths, thus counteracting historic gender bias and gendered power imbalances found in most traditional political institutions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1743-923X
1743-9248
DOI:10.1017/S1743923X14000415