Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The TEMPLATE (Ticagrelor Monotherapy and Platelet Reactivity) Randomized Controlled Trial

Background To assess differences in platelet inhibition during ticagrelor monotherapy (TIC) or dual therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin (TIC+ASP) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using a comprehensive panel of functional tests. Methods and Results In a single-center parallel grou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Heart Association Vol. 9; no. 24; p. e016495
Main Authors Johnson, Thomas W, Baos, Sarah, Collett, Laura, Hutchinson, James L, Nkau, Martin, Molina, Maria, Aungraheeta, Riyaad, Reilly-Stitt, Christopher, Bowles, Ruth, Reeves, Barnaby C, Rogers, Chris A, Mundell, Stuart J, Baumbach, Andreas, Mumford, Andrew D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley and Sons Inc 15.12.2020
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background To assess differences in platelet inhibition during ticagrelor monotherapy (TIC) or dual therapy with ticagrelor and aspirin (TIC+ASP) in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention using a comprehensive panel of functional tests. Methods and Results In a single-center parallel group, open label, randomized controlled trial, 110 participants were randomized to receive either TIC (n=55) or TIC+ASP (n=55) for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the platelet aggregation response with 10 μmol/L thrombin receptor activation peptide-6 (TRAP-6). The secondary outcomes were platelet aggregation responses and binding of surface activation markers with a panel of other activators. The mean percentage aggregation for 10 μmol/L TRAP-6 was similar for the TIC and TIC+ASP groups (mean difference+4.29; 95% CI, -0.87 to +9.46). Aggregation was higher in the TIC group compared with the TIC+ASP group with 1 μg/mL (+6.47; +2.04 to +10.90) and 0.5 μg/mL (+14.00; +7.63 to +20.39) collagen related peptide. Aggregation responses with 5 μmol/L TRAP-6, 5 μmol/L or 2.5 μmol/L thromboxane A receptor agonist and surface activation marker binding with 5 μmol/L TRAP-6 or 0.5 μg/mL collagen related peptide were the same between the treatment groups. Conclusions Patients with PCI show similar levels of inhibition of most platelet activation pathways with TIC compared with dual therapy with TIC + ASP. However, the greater aggregation response with collagen related peptide during TIC indicates incomplete inhibition of glycoprotein VI (collagen) receptor-mediated platelet activation. This difference in pharmacodynamic response to anti-platelet medication may contribute to the lower bleeding rates observed with TIC compared with dual antiplatelet therapy in recent clinical trials. Registration Information URL: https://www.isrctn.com; Unique Identifier ISRCTN84335288.
Bibliography:For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 8.
Prof. Baumbach and Dr. Mumford contributed equally to this work.
See Editorial by Capodanno and Angiolillo
Supplementary Material for this article is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/JAHA.120.016495.
ISSN:2047-9980
2047-9980
DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.016495