Integration of solid oxide fuel cell and palladium membrane reactor: Technical and economic analysis

• Published in: International journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 3894 - 3907
• Main Authors: Piroonlerkgul, P., Kiatkittipong, W., Arpornwichanop, A., Soottitantawat, A., Wiyaratn, W., Laosiripojana, N., Adesina, A.A., Assabumrungrat, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2009; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Biogas; Density; Economic analysis; Energy; Energy. Thermal use of fuels; Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc; Exact sciences and technology; Fuel cells; Fuels; Membranes; Palladium; Palladium membrane; Permeation; Reactors; Solid oxide fuel cell; Solid oxide fuel cells; Economic analysis; Biogas; Palladium membrane; Solid oxide fuel cell; Methane; Membrane reactor; Costs; Hydrogen; Palladium; Performance
• ISSN: 0360-3199; 1879-3487
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.02.049

This paper presents a technical and economic analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell system equipped with a palladium membrane reactor (PMR–SOFC) with the aim of determining the benefits of such an integrated unit over the conventional reformer module (CON-SOFC). The performance of both SOFC systems under the conditions for energetically self-sustaining operation ( Q NET = 0) was achieved by varying the fuel utilization for each operating voltage. Two types of fuels, i.e., methane and desulphurized biogas, are considered. The simulation results show that the maximum power density of the CON-SOFC fuelled by methane (0.423 W/cm 2) is higher than that of the CON-SOFC fuelled by biogas (0.399 W/cm 2) due to the presence of CO 2 in biogas. For the PMR–SOFC, it is found that the operation at a higher permeation pressure offers higher power density because lower fuel utilization is required when operating the SOFC at the energy self-sustained condition. When the membrane reactor is operated at the permeation pressure of 1 bar, the methane-fuelled and biogas-fuelled PMR–SOFCs can achieve the maximum power density of 0.4398 and 0.4213 W/cm 2, respectively. Although the PMR–SOFC can offer higher power density, compared with the CON-SOFC, the capital costs of supporting units, i.e., palladium membrane reactor, high-pressure compressor, and vacuum pump, for PMR–SOFC need to be taken into account. The economic analysis shows that the PMR–SOFC is not a good choice from an economic viewpoint because of the requirement of a large high-pressure compressor for feeding gas to the membrane reactor.