Guide-target mismatch effects on dCas9–sgRNA binding activity in living bacterial cells

Abstract As an effective programmable DNA targeting tool, CRISPR–Cas9 system has been adopted in varieties of biotechnological applications. However, the off-target effects, derived from the tolerance towards guide-target mismatches, are regarded as the major problems in engineering CRISPR systems....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNucleic acids research Vol. 49; no. 3; pp. 1263 - 1277
Main Authors Feng, Huibao, Guo, Jiahui, Wang, Tianmin, Zhang, Chong, Xing, Xin-hui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 22.02.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract As an effective programmable DNA targeting tool, CRISPR–Cas9 system has been adopted in varieties of biotechnological applications. However, the off-target effects, derived from the tolerance towards guide-target mismatches, are regarded as the major problems in engineering CRISPR systems. To understand this, we constructed two sgRNA libraries carrying saturated single- and double-nucleotide mismatches in living bacteria cells, and profiled the comprehensive landscape of in vivo binding affinity of dCas9 toward DNA target guided by each individual sgRNA with particular mismatches. We observed a synergistic effect in seed, where combinatorial double mutations caused more severe activity loss compared with the two corresponding single mutations. Moreover, we found that a particular mismatch type, dDrG (D = A, T, G), only showed moderate impairment on binding. To quantitatively understand the causal relationship between mismatch and binding behaviour of dCas9, we further established a biophysical model, and found that the thermodynamic properties of base-pairing coupled with strand invasion process, to a large extent, can account for the observed mismatch-activity landscape. Finally, we repurposed this model, together with a convolutional neural network constructed based on the same mechanism, as a predictive tool to guide the rational design of sgRNA in bacterial CRISPR interference.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first three authors should be regarded as Joint First Authors.
ISSN:0305-1048
1362-4962
DOI:10.1093/nar/gkaa1295