Fibroblast cell therapy enhances initial healing in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa wounds: results of a randomized, vehicle-controlled trial

Summary Background Fibroblast cell therapy can modify disease biology in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) although whether it improves wound healing is not clear. Objective To assess the effects of injecting of allogeneic fibroblasts into the margins of chronic erosions in individua...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 169; no. 5; pp. 1025 - 1033
Main Authors Petrof, G., Martinez-Queipo, M., Mellerio, J.E., Kemp, P., McGrath, J.A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2013
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background Fibroblast cell therapy can modify disease biology in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) although whether it improves wound healing is not clear. Objective To assess the effects of injecting of allogeneic fibroblasts into the margins of chronic erosions in individuals with RDEB in a prospective, double‐blind, randomized, vehicle‐controlled phase II trial. Methods Erosions were randomized 1 : 1, to either a single treatment of 5 × 106 fibroblasts per linear cm of erosion margin or vehicle. All subjects continued standard wound care. The trial sponsor, participants and study outcome assessor were masked to treatment allocation. A hierarchy of endpoints germane to erosion closure was assessed. Results Twenty‐six erosions in 11 subjects with RDEB were injected; 14 erosions received fibroblasts and 12 vehicle alone. A single series of injections was given at day 0 and all follow‐up visits were completed. Treatment difference between fibroblasts and vehicle was −23·5% [95% confidence interval (CI) −3·5 to −43·5, P = 0·025] at day 7, −19·15% (95% CI 3·36 to −41·66, P = 0·089) at day 14 and –28·83% (95% CI 7·97 to −65·63, P = 0·11) at day 28. Beyond day 28, however, changes in mean erosion area did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusion A single intradermal injection of allogeneic fibroblasts increases the initial rate of erosion healing in subjects with RDEB within the first 28 days but not thereafter. Further studies are needed to address the potential benefits of retreatment as well as optimal cell delivery. What's already known about this topic? There is a desperate need to develop new therapies for patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). Cultured fibroblasts represent a form of cell therapy that might have clinical utility in RDEB. Injecting allogeneic fibroblasts into RDEB skin has been shown to modify disease biology but whether this procedure has a beneficial impact on wound healing is not yet known. What does this study add? We assessed the effects of injecting of allogeneic fibroblasts into the margins of chronic erosions in individuals with RDEB in a prospective, double‐blind, randomized, vehicle‐controlled phase II trial. A single intradermal injection of allogeneic fibroblasts increases the initial rate of erosion healing in subjects with RDEB within the first 28 days but not thereafter. Further studies are needed to address the potential benefits of retreatment as well as optimal cell delivery.
Bibliography:Fig S1. Measurement of erosion size before and after fibroblast/vehicle. Fig S2. Quality-of-life measurement (trial data collection form). Table S1. Vehicle - HypoThermosol®-FRS constituents. Table S2. Independent, blinded to study treatment assessment of clinical digital photographs of study erosions. Table S3. Pain scores. Table S4. Quality-of-life measurements. Appendix S1. Synopsis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa therapies, past and present.
ArticleID:BJD12599
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
U.K. National Institute for Health Research
istex:C87481E0D46B556513C9FD66F1975354DF0FE25F
ark:/67375/WNG-XQGBW7WF-S
Biomedical Research Centre and the Clinical Research Facilities
King's College
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.12599