The role of early magnetic resonance imaging in predicting survival on bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: Results from a prospective clinical trial (CABARET)

BACKGROUND Bevacizumab has been associated with prolonged progression‐free survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma; however, not all derive a benefit. An early indicator of efficacy or futility may allow early discontinuation for nonresponders. This study prospectively assessed the role of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 123; no. 18; pp. 3576 - 3582
Main Authors Field, Kathryn M., Phal, Pramit M., Fitt, Greg, Goh, Christine, Nowak, Anna K., Rosenthal, Mark A., Simes, John, Barnes, Elizabeth H., Sawkins, Kate, Cher, Lawrence M., Hovey, Elizabeth J., Wheeler, Helen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 15.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND Bevacizumab has been associated with prolonged progression‐free survival for patients with recurrent glioblastoma; however, not all derive a benefit. An early indicator of efficacy or futility may allow early discontinuation for nonresponders. This study prospectively assessed the role of early magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI) and its correlation with subsequent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results and survival. METHODS Patients were part of a randomized phase 2 clinical trial (CABARET) comparing bevacizumab with bevacizumab plus carboplatin for recurrent glioblastoma. eMRI was conducted after 4 weeks in the trial (after 2 treatments with bevacizumab [10 mg/kg every 2 weeks]). The results were compared with the results of the subsequent 8‐week MRI standard. RESULTS For 119 of 122 patients, eMRI was available, and 111 had subsequent MRI for comparison. Thirty‐six (30%) had an early radiological response, and 17 (14%) had progressive disease. The concordance between eMRI and 8‐week MRI was moderate (κ = 0.56), with most providing the same result (n = 79 [71%]). There was strong evidence that progression‐free survival and overall survival were predicted by the eMRI response (both P values < .001). The median survival was 8.6 months for an eMRI response, 6.6 months for stable disease, and 3.7 months for progressive disease; the hazard ratio (progressive disease vs stable disease) was 3.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.9‐6.0). Landmark analyses showed that eMRI progression was a strong predictor of mortality independent of other potential baseline predictors. CONCLUSIONS In this study, early progression on MRI appears to be a robust marker of a poor prognosis for patients on bevacizumab. Cancer 2017;123:3576‐82. © 2017 American Cancer Society. Data from a prospective, randomized phase 2 clinical trial of patients with recurrent glioblastoma have been used to determine whether the magnetic resonance imaging results at 4 weeks correlate with survival. Disease progression on early magnetic resonance imaging is strongly associated with inferior overall survival, and this is independent of other predictors of survival at the baseline.
Bibliography:This trial was conducted under the auspices of the Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro‐Oncology, was coordinated at the National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre (University of Sydney), and was supported by Roche Products Pty Limited (Australia). Kathryn M. Field (chair), John Simes, Elizabeth J. Hovey, Anna K. Nowak, Lawrence M. Cher, Helen Wheeler, C. Brown, Elizabeth H. Barnes, Kate Sawkins, Anne Livingstone, and Mark A. Rosenthal composed the trial management committee; Pramit M. Phal, Greg Fitt, and Christine Goh composed the independent central radiological review committee; and Martin Tattersall (chair), P. Kelly, and A. Hayden composed the independent data safety monitoring committee. Kate Sawkins, Chris Brown, Elizabeth H. Barnes, Ann Livingstone, Diana Winter, Bernadette Tomes, Rhana Pike, and John Simes work at the Clinical Trials Centre, and Brad Moffat and Simon Salinas work at the Brain Imaging Laboratory of the Royal Melbourne Hospital.
CABARET was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number ACTRN12610000915055).
This trial was performed after approval by the relevant ethics committee at each participating site. All principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki have been followed. Informed consent was obtained from each participant.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.30838