Flies and Fish: Birds of a Feather

The identification of specific clock‐containing structures has been a major endeavour of the circadian field for many years. This has lead to the identification of many key components of the circadian system, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, and the eyes and pineal glands in lower v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuroendocrinology Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 344 - 349
Main Authors Katherine Tamai, T., Vardhanabhuti, V., Arthur, S., Foulkes, N. S., Whitmore, D.
Format Journal Article Conference Proceeding
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Science, Ltd 01.04.2003
Blackwell Science
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The identification of specific clock‐containing structures has been a major endeavour of the circadian field for many years. This has lead to the identification of many key components of the circadian system, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, and the eyes and pineal glands in lower vertebrates. However, the idea that these structures represent the only clocks in animals has been challenged by the discovery of peripheral pacemakers in most organs and tissues, and even a number of cell lines. In Drosophila, and vertebrates such as the zebrafish, these peripheral clocks appear to be highly autonomous, being set directly by the environmental light/dark cycle. However, a hierarchy of clocks may still exist in mammals. In this review, we examine some of the current views regarding peripheral clocks, their organization and how they are entrained.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JNE974
ark:/67375/WNG-58LRT2KT-3
istex:CDDECAA22857557D54183D2C1DCD84D25B76F8AE
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0953-8194
1365-2826
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.00974.x