Flies and Fish: Birds of a Feather
The identification of specific clock‐containing structures has been a major endeavour of the circadian field for many years. This has lead to the identification of many key components of the circadian system, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, and the eyes and pineal glands in lower v...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neuroendocrinology Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 344 - 349 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Conference Proceeding |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science, Ltd
01.04.2003
Blackwell Science Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The identification of specific clock‐containing structures has been a major endeavour of the circadian field for many years. This has lead to the identification of many key components of the circadian system, including the suprachiasmatic nucleus in mammals, and the eyes and pineal glands in lower vertebrates. However, the idea that these structures represent the only clocks in animals has been challenged by the discovery of peripheral pacemakers in most organs and tissues, and even a number of cell lines. In Drosophila, and vertebrates such as the zebrafish, these peripheral clocks appear to be highly autonomous, being set directly by the environmental light/dark cycle. However, a hierarchy of clocks may still exist in mammals. In this review, we examine some of the current views regarding peripheral clocks, their organization and how they are entrained. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:JNE974 ark:/67375/WNG-58LRT2KT-3 istex:CDDECAA22857557D54183D2C1DCD84D25B76F8AE ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0953-8194 1365-2826 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2003.00974.x |