Expression of EGFR and c-kit is associated with the basal-like phenotype in breast carcinomas of African women

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-kit are tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors which are frequently expressed in basal-like breast carcinomas, and tyrosine kinase inhibition is now a promising strategy in treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica et immunologica Scandinavica Vol. 116; no. 6; pp. 515 - 525
Main Author NALWOGA, HAWA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-kit are tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors which are frequently expressed in basal-like breast carcinomas, and tyrosine kinase inhibition is now a promising strategy in treatment of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of EGFR and c-kit in breast cancer with special focus on the basal-like phenotype (BLP) and other prognostic factors in an African population. We analyzed 65 archival tissues immunohistologically. EGFR and/or c-kit were expressed in 55% of basal-like tumors. Expression of EGFR and/or c-kit was strongly associated with high histologic grade (P=0.001), high nuclear grade (P=0.017), high mitotic counts (P=0.002), ER negativity (P=0.003), PR negativity (P=0.007), and HER2 negativity (P=0.014). EGFR and/or c-kit positive tumors were more likely to express the BLP (OR 9.1, CI 2.6-32.0, P<0.0005) than the negative tumors. In conclusion, there is a high expression of EGFR and/or c-kit in basal-like breast carcinoma in this series from Uganda and their expression is associated with features of poor prognosis. More studies are required to assess the clinical significance of EGFR and c-kit in breast cancer patients in Uganda.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.01024.x
Received 13 December 2007. Accepted 20 January 2008.
istex:C2300C388E344D3295F75E111E7577EE8EDFC8D1
ark:/67375/WNG-XK4R9ZJ5-C
ArticleID:APM1024
Received 13 December 2007.
Accepted 20 January 2008.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0903-4641
1600-0463
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2008.01024.x