Modeling cancer glycolysis under hypoglycemia, and the role played by the differential expression of glycolytic isoforms

The effect of hypoglycemia on the contents of glycolytic proteins, activities of enzymes/transporters and flux of HeLa and MCF‐7 tumor cells was experimentally analyzed and modeled in silico. After 24 h hypoglycemia (2.5 mm initial glucose), significant increases in the protein levels of glucose tra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe FEBS journal Vol. 281; no. 15; pp. 3325 - 3345
Main Authors Marín‐Hernández, Alvaro, López‐Ramírez, Sayra Y., Del Mazo‐Monsalvo, Isis, Gallardo‐Pérez, Juan C., Rodríguez‐Enríquez, Sara, Moreno‐Sánchez, Rafael, Saavedra, Emma
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The effect of hypoglycemia on the contents of glycolytic proteins, activities of enzymes/transporters and flux of HeLa and MCF‐7 tumor cells was experimentally analyzed and modeled in silico. After 24 h hypoglycemia (2.5 mm initial glucose), significant increases in the protein levels of glucose transporters 1 and 3 (GLUT 1 and 3) (3.4 and 2.1‐fold, respectively) and hexokinase I (HKI) (2.3‐fold) were observed compared to the hyperglycemic standard cell culture condition (25 mm initial glucose). However, these changes did not bring about a significant increase in the total activities (Vmax) of GLUT and HK; instead, the affinity of these proteins for glucose increased, which may explain the twofold increased glycolytic flux under hypoglycemia. Thus, an increase in more catalytically efficient isoforms for two of the main controlling steps was sufficient to induce increased flux. Further, a previous kinetic model of tumor glycolysis was updated by including the ratios of GLUT and HK isoforms, modified pyruvate kinase kinetics and an oxidative phosphorylation reaction. The updated model was robust in terms of simulating most of the metabolite levels and fluxes of the cells exposed to various glycemic conditions. Model simulations indicated that the main controlling steps were glycogen degradation > HK > hexosephosphate isomerase under hyper‐ and normoglycemia, and GLUT > HK > glycogen degradation under hypoglycemia. These predictions were experimentally evaluated: the glycolytic flux of hypoglycemic cells was more sensitive to cytochalasin B (a GLUT inhibitor) than that of hyperglycemic cells. The results indicated that cancer glycolysis should be inhibited at multiple controlling sites, regardless of external glucose levels, to effectively block the pathway. Database The mathematical models described here have been submitted to the JWS Online Cellular Systems Modelling Database and can be accessed at http://jjj.mib.ac.uk/database/achcar/index.html. [Database section added 21 July 2014 after original online publication] Hypoglycemia promotes over‐expression of high affinity HK and GLUT isoforms resulting in two‐fold increased glycolytic flux compared to hyper‐ and normo‐ glycemia. Kinetic modeling demonstrated that the main controlling step in hypoglycemic cells was GLUT resulting in higher dependence on external glucose. Accordingly, 2‐fold lower cytochalasin B concentration inhibited the glycolytic flux in hypoglycemic tumor cells, as compared to hyperglycemic cells.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1742-464X
1742-4658
DOI:10.1111/febs.12864