Actigraphy: Analyzing patient movement

Background Actigraphic data during simulated participant movements were evaluated to differentiate among patient behavior states. Methods Arm and leg actigraphic data were collected on 30 volunteers who simulated 3 behavioral states (calm, restless, agitated) for 10 minutes; counts of observed parti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart & lung Vol. 40; no. 3; pp. e52 - e59
Main Authors Grap, Mary Jo, RN, PhD, ACNP, FAAN, Hamilton, Virginia A., RN, MS, FNP, McNallen, Ann, RN, MS, Ketchum, Jessica M., PhD, Best, Al M., PhD, Isti Arief, Nyimas Y., MS, Wetzel, Paul A., PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.05.2011
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Actigraphic data during simulated participant movements were evaluated to differentiate among patient behavior states. Methods Arm and leg actigraphic data were collected on 30 volunteers who simulated 3 behavioral states (calm, restless, agitated) for 10 minutes; counts of observed participant movements (head, torso, extremities) were documented. Results The mean age of participants was 34.7 years, and 60% were female. Average movement was significantly different among the states ( P < .0001; calm [mean = .48], restless [mean = 2.16], agitated [mean = 3.75]). Mean actigraphic measures were significantly different among states for both arm ( P < .0001; calm [mean = 6.8], restless [mean = 28.5], agitated [mean = 52.6]) and leg ( P < .0001; calm [mean = 3.5], restless [mean = 18.7], agitated [mean = 37.7]). Conclusion Distinct levels of behavioral states were successfully simulated. Actigraphic data can provide an objective indicator of patient activity over a variety of behavioral states, and these data may offer a standard for comparison among these states.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0147-9563
1527-3288
DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2009.12.013