Measuring glucose concentrations in the rat brain using echo-time-averaged point resolved spectroscopy at 7 tesla

Glucose has multiple functions in the brain, and there is interest in estimating in vivo concentrations rather than merely the uptake determined by nuclear medicine. Glucose can be estimated using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, but measurement is difficult due to its multiple J‐coupled proton sign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMagnetic resonance in medicine Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 301 - 308
Main Authors Steinberg, Jeffrey D., Velan, S. Sendhil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Glucose has multiple functions in the brain, and there is interest in estimating in vivo concentrations rather than merely the uptake determined by nuclear medicine. Glucose can be estimated using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, but measurement is difficult due to its multiple J‐coupled proton signals overlapping with other metabolite signals. To minimize the effect of interfering signals, echo time (TE) values between 60 and 95 ms were averaged, and the loss in signal due to the T2 effect was corrected in both the estimation of glucose concentration and in creation of the basis files for fitting. The effectiveness of the TE‐averaging method was evaluated by measuring the glucose concentration in fasted rats before and after feeding. The brain glucose in all rats increased after feeding with fasted and fed glucose‐to‐creatine ratios of 0.15 ± 0.03 and 0.24 ± 0.04, respectively. Data at a short TE of 13 ms measured ratios of 0.30 ± 0.16 and 0.36 ± 0.24 for the fasted and fed rats, respectively, demonstrating the difficulty in obtaining reliable glucose measurements at short TE. Overall, TE averaging minimizes the influence of macromolecular signals and nearby peaks to give precise, consistent estimates of glucose. Magn Reson Med 70:301–308, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-M283WX5R-K
istex:D13AF28685252900854CD7D360DE6A0D5CF4E6FF
ArticleID:MRM24493
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.24493