Tumefactive demyelination: clinical, imaging and follow-up observations in thirty-nine patients

• Published in: Acta neurologica Scandinavica Vol. 128; no. 1; pp. 39 - 47
• Main Authors: Nagappa, M., Taly, A. B., Sinha, S., Bharath, R. D., Mahadevan, A., Bindu, P. S., Saini, J. S., Prasad, C., Shankar, S. K.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2013; Hindawi Limited
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Brain - pathology; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Demyelinating Diseases - complications; Demyelinating Diseases - pathology; Demyelinating Diseases - therapy; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; relapsing-remitting; Risk Factors; Spinal Cord - pathology; steroid; Treatment Outcome; tumefactive demyelination; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0001-6314; 1600-0404
• DOI: 10.1111/ane.12071

Purpose We describe the clinical, neuroimaging and pathological features and therapeutic outcome in a large cohort of 39 patients with tumefactive demyelination. Materials and Methods A retrospective audit of 39 patients with ‘tumefactive demyelination’ was performed. The demographic, clinical, MR imaging and pathological details were reviewed. Results The clinical course was monophasic (n = 22) or relapsing–remitting (n = 17). Common neurological manifestations at presentation included hemiparesis ‐ 27; ataxia ‐ 11; vomiting ‐ 10; headache ‐9; ophthalmoplegia ‐ 7; seizure ‐ 5; impaired vision ‐ 4; aphasia ‐ 4; visual field defects ‐ 3; papilloedema ‐ 5; extrapyramidal ‐ 5; intellectual decline ‐ 5; behavioural disturbances ‐ 3; altered sensorium ‐ 5. MRI revealed fronto‐parietal lesions, which were isolated in 14 (36%) patients. Moderate perilesional oedema and/or mass effect was noted in 12 (30.8%) patients. Post‐contrast MR sequences revealed partial ring enhancement in 15, complete ring in seven, patchy enhancement in six, uniform enhancement in two and lack of enhancement in nine cases. Clinical and MR characteristics did not help distinguish between monophasic and relapsing‐remitting subgroups. In the monophasic group, 53.8% had complete recovery, while 38.5% had partial improvement (follow‐up duration, 8.31 ± 9.3 months). In the relapsing‐remitting subgroup, the median time to relapse was 4 months (n = 12, follow‐up, 37.8 ± 39.4 months). Patients with monophasic course or single relapse received steroids. Patients with more than one relapse received cyclophosphamide (2), mycophenolate (1), azathioprine (1) or methotrexate (1). Conclusions A high proportion of cases of tumefactive demyelination follow a relapsing course, thus necessitating a long‐term follow‐up. MRI, although helpful in diagnosis, does not predict monophasic or relapsing‐remitting course. Guidelines for the management of acute episodes and prevention of relapses are required.