Hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in right lobe graft without middle hepatic vein
Background: We explored the pattern of hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in adult right lobe (segments V5–8) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) without the middle hepatic vein (MHV). The difficulty and challenge of LDLT without MHV is the outflow reconstruction of hepatic vein. We have m...
Saved in:
Published in | Hepatology research Vol. 37; no. 12; pp. 1044 - 1051 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Melbourne, Australia
Blackwell Publishing Asia
01.12.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: We explored the pattern of hepatic venous outflow reconstruction in adult right lobe (segments V5–8) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) without the middle hepatic vein (MHV). The difficulty and challenge of LDLT without MHV is the outflow reconstruction of hepatic vein. We have modified the surgical procedure and here report the results.
Methods: Retrospective analysis was made of the clinical data of 50 recipients who underwent LDLT using right lobe without MHV.
Results: Forty‐five recipients (90.0%, 45/50) are alive at median follow up of 10 months. The graft‐to‐recipient bodyweight ratio (GRWR) was 1.21% ± 0.49% (range, 0.72% to 1.98%). The recipients of GRWR <0.8% (extra‐small graft), 0.8% < GRWR < 1.2% (small graft) and GRWR > 1.2% (ideal graft) were 14, 27 and 9, respectively. Total ratio venous outflowreconstruction of V5, V8 and inferior right hepatic vein was 66.0% (33/50). The overall incidence of small‐for‐size syndrome was 10.0% (n = 5), the overall graft survival rate was 92.0% (46/50).
Conclusions: Graft function and survival rates are not only influenced by graft size, but also by hepatic venous outflow reconstruction; the ‘multiple‐opening vertical anastomosis’ for reconstruction of hepatic vein outflow was used when the GRWR was smaller than 1.2%. This technique alleviates surgical risk in living donors, ensures excellent venous drainage, and reduces the incidence of small‐for‐size syndrome. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ArticleID:HEPR121 istex:57D1E3ACDCC61B81D5D57D1CB39EE36DDF9B95FF ark:/67375/WNG-RJPH1NM3-B ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1386-6346 1872-034X |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00121.x |