Nonlinear eddy viscosity modeling and experimental study of jet spreading rates

Indoor airflow pattern is strongly influenced by turbulent shear and turbulent normal stresses that are responsible for entrainment effects and turbulence‐driven secondary motion. Therefore, an accurate prediction of room airflows requires reliable modeling of these turbulent quantities. The most wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndoor air Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 93 - 102
Main Authors Heschl, C., Inthavong, K., Sanz, W., Tu, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2014
Hindawi Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Indoor airflow pattern is strongly influenced by turbulent shear and turbulent normal stresses that are responsible for entrainment effects and turbulence‐driven secondary motion. Therefore, an accurate prediction of room airflows requires reliable modeling of these turbulent quantities. The most widely used turbulence models include RANS‐based models that provide quick solutions but are known to fail in turbulent free shear and wall‐affected flows. In order to cope with this deficiency, this study presents a nonlinear k‐ε turbulence model and evaluates it along with linear k‐ε models for an indoor isothermal linear diffuser jet flow measured in two model rooms using PIV. The results show that the flow contains a free jet near the inlet region and a wall‐affected region downstream where the jet is pushed toward the ceiling by entrainment through the well‐known Coanda effect. The CFD results show that an accurate prediction of the entrainment process is very important and that the nonlinear eddy viscosity model is able to predict the turbulence‐driven secondary motions. Furthermore, turbulence models that are calibrated for high Reynolds free shear layer flows were not able to reproduce the measured velocity distributions, and it is suggested that the model constants of turbulence models should be adjusted before they are used for room airflow simulations.
Bibliography:istex:E2E9D2DA6D2FB9813A1E7249EC7E1D1D22B9AAC4
ark:/67375/WNG-B61GQ7W4-X
ArticleID:INA12050
Figure S1. (a) Schematic of indoor flow phenomena caused by jet flows. (b) Definitions of lateral and normal spreading rates of jet flows. (c) PIV measurement planes.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0905-6947
1600-0668
DOI:10.1111/ina.12050