Fifty‐five years of enzyme classification: advances and difficulties

• Published in: The FEBS journal Vol. 281; no. 2; pp. 583 - 592
• Main Authors: McDonald, Andrew G., Tipton, Keith F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2014
• Subjects: Animals; Biocatalysis; Classification; Databases, Protein; EC number; enzyme database; Enzymes; Enzymes - chemistry; Enzymes - classification; ExplorEnz; Humans; IUBMB; IUPAC names; Reference Standards; Terminology as Topic; ExplorEnz; EC number; enzyme database; IUBMB; IUPAC names
• ISSN: 1742-464X; 1742-4658
• DOI: 10.1111/febs.12530

Since the publication of a list of enzymes classified according to the reactions that they catalysed, by Dixon and Webb in 1958, its content and presentation have undergone a number of significant changes. These have been necessitated by new information, as well as the need to improve clarity. The move from printed versions to the online environment, through the ExplorEnz website, has allowed the process of adding newly reported enzymes to be automated and the information content to be enriched. Search and output facilities have also been enhanced. These and the problems attendant on the use of the Enzyme Commission classification system for some groups of enzymes are the subject of this review. The list of ‘enzymes classified according to the reactions they catalyse’ has been developed significantly since its first publication by Dixon & Webb in 1958. The number of enzymes has greatly increased and the ExplorEnz online version has enhanced content, search and output facilities. These and some problems associated with the EC classification system are described in this review.