Extensive Individual Differences in Brain Activations Associated with Episodic Retrieval are Reliable Over Time

The localization of brain functions using neuroimaging techniques is commonly dependent on statistical analyses of groups of subjects in order to identify sites of activation, particularly in studies of episodic memory. Exclusive reliance on group analysis may be to the detriment of understanding th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cognitive neuroscience Vol. 14; no. 8; pp. 1200 - 1214
Main Authors Miller, Michael B., Van Horn, John Darrell, Wolford, George L., Handy, Todd C., Valsangkar-Smyth, Monica, Inati, Souheil, Grafton, Scott, Gazzaniga, Michael S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA MIT Press 15.11.2002
MIT Press Journals, The
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The localization of brain functions using neuroimaging techniques is commonly dependent on statistical analyses of groups of subjects in order to identify sites of activation, particularly in studies of episodic memory. Exclusive reliance on group analysis may be to the detriment of understanding the true underlying cognitive nature of brain activations. In the present study, we found that the patterns of brain activity associated with episodic retrieval are very distinct for individual subjects from the patterns of brain activity at the group level. These differences go beyond the relatively small variations due to cyctoarchitectonic differences or spatial normalization. We quantify this individual variability by cross-correlating volumes of brain images. We demonstrate that individual patterns of brain activity are reliable over time despite their extensive variability. We suggest that varied but reliable individual patterns of significant brain activity may be indicative of different cognitive strategies used to produce a recognition response. We believe that individual analysis in conjunction with group analysis may be critical to fully understanding the relationship between retrieval processes and underlying brain regions.
Bibliography:November, 2002
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0898-929X
1530-8898
DOI:10.1162/089892902760807203