Automatic Skin Cancer Detection Using Clinical Images: A Comprehensive Review

• Published in: Life (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 13; no. 11; p. 2123
• Main Authors: Nazari, Sana, Garcia, Rafael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Artificial intelligence; automated diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions (PSLs), computer-aided diagnosis; Automation; Cancer; Classification; clinical skin images; Computer-aided medical diagnosis; Datasets; Dermatology; Diagnosis; Eye examinations; Image processing; Learning algorithms; Lesions; literature review; Machine learning; Melanoma; melanoma detection; Methods; Mutation; Neural networks; Skin; Skin cancer; skin cancer detection; State-of-the-art reviews; Tumors; Spain
• ISSN: 2075-1729; 2075-1729
• DOI: 10.3390/life13112123

Skin cancer has become increasingly common over the past decade, with melanoma being the most aggressive type. Hence, early detection of skin cancer and melanoma is essential in dermatology. Computational methods can be a valuable tool for assisting dermatologists in identifying skin cancer. Most research in machine learning for skin cancer detection has focused on dermoscopy images due to the existence of larger image datasets. However, general practitioners typically do not have access to a dermoscope and must rely on naked-eye examinations or standard clinical images. By using standard, off-the-shelf cameras to detect high-risk moles, machine learning has also proven to be an effective tool. The objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of image-processing techniques for skin cancer detection using clinical images. In this study, we evaluate 51 state-of-the-art articles that have used machine learning methods to detect skin cancer over the past decade, focusing on clinical datasets. Even though several studies have been conducted in this field, there are still few publicly available clinical datasets with sufficient data that can be used as a benchmark, especially when compared to the existing dermoscopy databases. In addition, we observed that the available artifact removal approaches are not quite adequate in some cases and may also have a negative impact on the models. Moreover, the majority of the reviewed articles are working with single-lesion images and do not consider typical mole patterns and temporal changes in the lesions of each patient.