Animal, Subject, Constitution

[...]very little, if any, account is taken of ethological and primatological studies by these theorists in their discussion of animals. [...]he raises questions about whether human beings can in fact be said to have the specific characteristic or ability which is attributed to them exclusively, for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMosaic (Winnipeg) Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 113 - 128
Main Author De Ville, Jacques
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Winnipeg Mosaic, an interdisciplinary critical journal 01.03.2021
University of Manitoba, Mosaic
MOSAIC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[...]very little, if any, account is taken of ethological and primatological studies by these theorists in their discussion of animals. [...]he raises questions about whether human beings can in fact be said to have the specific characteristic or ability which is attributed to them exclusively, for example, autonomy, responsibility, morality, or having access to death as such. According to Kant in the Anthropology, this is the power to say "I" as well as the ability to enter the "civil condition." According to Kant, human beings share in two worlds: the sensible and the intelligible.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:0027-1276
1925-5683
1925-5683
DOI:10.1353/mos.2021.0007