A comparison of work stressors in higher and lower resourced emergency medicine health settings

• Published in: Canadian journal of emergency medicine Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 713 - 720
• Main Authors: de Haan, Sebastian, Lamprecht, Hein, Howlett, Michael K., Fraser, Jacqueline, Sohi, Dylan, Adisesh, Anil, Atkinson, Paul R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.09.2018; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Brief Original Contribution; Burnout; Electronic mail systems; Emergency medical care; Medicine; Occupational stress; Patient safety; Physicians; Population; Professions; Statistical analysis; Studies; Supply & demand; Work environment; Workers; Canada; Washington DC; South Africa; United Kingdom > UK; workplace stressors; emergency medicine; management; occupational health
• ISSN: 1481-8035; 1481-8043
• DOI: 10.1017/cem.2018.14

The study compares experiences of workplace stressors for emergency medicine trainees and specialists in settings where the specialty is relatively well resourced and established (Canada), and where it is newer and less well resourced (South Africa, (SA)). We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of emergency medicine trainees and physicians in both countries for six domains (demands, role, support, change, control, and relationships) using the validated Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT, Health, and Safety Executive, United Kingdom). 74 SA and 430 Canadian respondents were included in our analysis. SA trainees (n=38) reported higher stressors (lower MSIT scores) than SA specialists (n=36) for demands (2.2 (95%CI 2.1-2.3) vs. 2.7 (2.5-2.8)), control (2.6 (2.4-2.7) vs. 3.5 (3.3-3.7)) and change (2.4 (2.2-2.6) vs. 3.0 (2.7-3.3)). In Canada, specialists (n=395) had higher demands (2.6 (2.6-2.7) vs. 3.0 (2.8-3.1)) and manager support stressors (3.3 (3.3-3.4) vs. 3.9 (3.6-4.1)) than trainees (n=35). Canadian trainees reported higher role stressors (4.0 (95%CI 3.8-4.1) vs. 4.2 (4.2-4.3)) than Canadian specialists. SA trainees had higher stressors on all domains than Canadian trainees. There was one domain (control) where Canadian specialists scored significantly lower than SA specialists, whereas SA specialists had significantly lower scores on peer support, relationships and role. Work related stressor domains were different for all four groups. Perceived stressors were higher in all measured domains among SA trainees compared with Canadian trainees. The differences between the SA and Canadian specialists may reflect the developing nature of the specialty in SA, although the Canadian specialists reported less control over their work than SA counterparts.