Cross-cultural Validation of the Child Abuse Potential Inventory in Belgium (Flanders): Relations with Demographic Characteristics and Parenting Problems

• Published in: Journal of family violence Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 223 - 229
• Main Authors: Grietens, Hans, Haene, Lucia De, Uyttebroek, Karolien
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer 01.05.2007; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Attribution; Belgium; Child Abuse; Child abuse & neglect; Child rearing; Childrearing Practices; Children; Cultural differences; Demography; Emotions; Empirical research; Etiology; Family studies; Generalizability; Locus of control; Measures; Mothers; Parent Child Relations; Parental stress; Parenting; Parents; Parents & parenting; Potential; Psychological tests; Questionnaires; Reliability; Screening; Stress; Tests; Validity; Belgium
• ISSN: 0885-7482; 1573-2851
• DOI: 10.1007/s10896-007-9074-2

This study examined the reliability and the validity of the Dutch CAP Inventory, a screening instrument that measures parents potential for child physical abuse (Milner, The Child Abuse Potential Inventory: Manual (2nd ed.), Psytec, Webster, NC, 1986). The CAP Inventory and measures on parenting stress and parents emotions and attributions with regard to childrearing were administered in a nonclinical sample of randomly selected mothers (N=362) with a 4-to-i 1-year-old child. The CAP Inventory Abuse scale showed high internal consistency and split-half reliability. Twenty-four CAP Inventories (6.6%) were invalid, because mothers tended to present themselves either as too good or too bad. Sixteen valid CAP Inventories (4.4%) were indicative of high potential for abuse. Scores on the Abuse scale were significantly predicted by an external locus of control with regard to childrearing and by high levels of parenting stress. Results supported the cross-cultural generalizability of the CAP Inventory Abuse scale. Adapted from the source document.