Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Therapeutic advances in infectious disease Vol. 6; p. 2049936119886465
• Main Authors: Rosanova, María Teresa, Bes, David, Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro, Sberna, Norma, Herrera-Ramos, Estefania, Lede, Roberto Luis
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2019; Sage Publications Ltd; SAGE Publishing
• Subjects: Antibiotics; Clinical trials; Daptomycin; Meta-analysis; Original Research; Quality control; Safety; Systematic review; systematic review; daptomycin; skin infections
• ISSN: 2049-9361; 2049-937X
• DOI: 10.1177/2049936119886465

Background: The aim of this study was to assess whether daptomycin is safer and more efficacious than comparators for the treatment of serious infection caused by gram-positive microorganisms. Methods: Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and clinical registered trials) were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the efficacy and safety of daptomycin versus therapy with any other antibiotic comparator. Two reviewers independently applied selection criteria, performed a quality assessment and extracted the data. Heterogeneity was assessed, and a random-effects or fixed-effects model, when appropriate, was used for estimates of risk ratio (RR). The primary outcome assessed was the risk of clinical treatment failure among the intention-to-treat population and the presence of any treatment related adverse event (AEs). Results: A total of seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Daptomycin treatment failure rates were no different to comparator regimens (RR = 0.96; CI 95% 0.86–1.06). No significantly different treatment related AEs were identified when comparing groups (RR = 0.91; CI 95% 0.83–1.01). Conclusions: No significant differences in treatment failure rates and safety were found using daptomycin or any of the comparators treatment.