Does Feedback to Physicians of a Patient-Reported Readiness for Discharge Checklist Improve Discharge?

Limited data exist describing how hospital discharge readiness checklists might be incorporated into care. To evaluate how assessing patient readiness for discharge effects discharge outcomes. We assessed hospitalized adults’ readiness for discharge daily using a checklist. In the first feedback per...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of patient experience Vol. 7; no. 6; pp. 1144 - 1150
Main Authors Harrison, James D, Boscardin, W John, Maselli, Judith, Auerbach, Andrew D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2020
Sage Publications Ltd
SAGE Publishing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Limited data exist describing how hospital discharge readiness checklists might be incorporated into care. To evaluate how assessing patient readiness for discharge effects discharge outcomes. We assessed hospitalized adults’ readiness for discharge daily using a checklist. In the first feedback period, readiness data were given to patients, compared to the second feedback period, where data were given to patients and physicians. In the first feedback period, 163 patients completed 296 checklists, and in the second feedback period, 179 patients completed 371 checklists. In the first feedback period, 889 discharge barriers were identified, and 1154 in the second feedback period (P = .27). We found no association between the mean number of discharge barriers by hospital day and whether data were provided to physicians (P = .39). Eighty-nine physicians completed our survey, with 76 (85%) recalling receiving checklist data. Twenty-three (30%) of these thought the data helpful, and 45 (59%) stated it “never” or “rarely” highlighted anything new. Patients continued to report discharge barriers even when physicians received patient-reported data about key discharge transition domains.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2374-3735
2374-3743
DOI:10.1177/2374373519895100