The response to professor K.S. Tűrker on his “an opinion on the 'delayed spikes' in human motoneurons”

This is the response to Prof. Tűrker on his note “challenging” our hypothesis assuming the possibility of two modes of spiking (direct and delayed) evoked by Ia-afferent electrical stimulation in human firing motoneurones. Besides, we touch on some common questions about the most relevant, functiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inExperimental brain research Vol. 240; no. 1; pp. 5 - 7
Main Authors Kudina, L. P., Andreeva, R. E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Action Potentials
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Electric Stimulation
Electrical stimuli
Firing pattern
Humans
Letter to the Editor
Motor Neurons
Motor task performance
Muscle Contraction
Neurology
Neurosciences
Sensory neurons
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This is the response to Prof. Tűrker on his note “challenging” our hypothesis assuming the possibility of two modes of spiking (direct and delayed) evoked by Ia-afferent electrical stimulation in human firing motoneurones. Besides, we touch on some common questions about the most relevant, functionally significant, estimations of motoneuronal firing behaviour in human motor control. In particular, in this context, the question arises: what is more important estimation, motoneurone spiking, itself, or a value of the corresponding interspike interval of the firing motoneurone?
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-021-06262-x