Active metabolite concentration of clopidogrel in patients taking different doses of aspirin: results of the interaction trial

Summary Background The CURRENT‐OASIS‐7 and PLATO trials suggest that the benefit of clopidogrel is influenced by the dose of aspirin. Objective To explore a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between aspirin and clopidogrel, and determinants of clopidogrel active metabolite (AM) levels. Methods I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 347 - 352
Main Authors Liang, Y., Hirsh, J., Weitz, J. I., Sloane, D., Gao, P., Pare, G., Zhu, J., Eikelboom, J. W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Limited 01.03.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI10.1111/jth.12829

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Background The CURRENT‐OASIS‐7 and PLATO trials suggest that the benefit of clopidogrel is influenced by the dose of aspirin. Objective To explore a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between aspirin and clopidogrel, and determinants of clopidogrel active metabolite (AM) levels. Methods In part 1, using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we randomized patients to clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by 150 mg day−1 for 6 days and 75 mg day−1 thereafter, or clopidogrel 300 mg LD followed by 75 mg day−1 thereafter, and compared aspirin at 325 mg or 81 mg day−1. In part 2, patients were given a 600‐mg clopidogrel LD, and were randomly allocated to aspirin 325 mg or 81 mg day−1. We combine the data from the two parts. Blood samples were collected 1 h after administration of the study drug. Results We randomized 302 patients (mean age 60.4 ± 9.9 years). Clopidogrel AM levels were similar in patients randomized to aspirin 325 or 81 mg (geometric mean, 12.70 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 10.96–14.72 ng mL−1; and geometric mean, 12.55 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 10.80–14.58 ng mL−1; P = 0.91). Blood levels of clopidogrel were lower in CYP2C19*2 loss‐of‐function (LOF) carriers compared with non‐carriers (10.72 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 8.83–13.01 ng mL−1; and 15.21 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 13.30–17.40 ng mL−1, respectively; P = 0.003) whereas levels in gain of function carriers and non‐carriers were similar (13.31 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 11.53–15.35 ng mL−1; and 14.07 ng mL−1; 95% CI, 11.74–16.87 ng mL−1, respectively; P = 0.4). Independent baseline predictors of clopidogrel AM levels were LOF genotype, body mass index, diabetes, proton pump inhibitor use and creatinine clearance, but accounted for only 20% of the variability in levels. Conclusion Aspirin dose does not predict clopidogrel AM levels 1 h post‐LD. Most of the variability in clopidogrel AM levels is not explained by patient characteristics or CYP2C19 metabolizer status.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1538-7933
1538-7836
1538-7836
DOI:10.1111/jth.12829