Testing for Variation in Animal Preference for Jesup Tall Fescue Hays with Wild-Type, Novel, or No Fungal Endophyte

Tall fescue [Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub.] is an important source of forage but often contains a fungal endophyte [Neotyphodium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones and Gams) Glenn, Bacon, and Hanlin] that can produce alkaloids and decrease animal performance. Removing the endophyte can reduce agronomic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop science Vol. 48; no. 5; pp. 2026 - 2032
Main Authors Fisher, D.S, Burns, J.C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison Crop Science Society of America 01.09.2008
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Tall fescue [Schedonorus phoenix (Scop.) Holub.] is an important source of forage but often contains a fungal endophyte [Neotyphodium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones and Gams) Glenn, Bacon, and Hanlin] that can produce alkaloids and decrease animal performance. Removing the endophyte can reduce agronomic performance and persistence. An improved cultivar ('Jesup') with a novel (nontoxic) endophyte (trademark "MaxQ") has improved agronomic performance. Persistence may be related to agronomic traits and animal feeding preferences. We tested for variation in animal preference among two harvests by testing each of three hays made from Jesup tall fescue that varied in endophyte status (no endophyte, containing the novel endophyte, or containing a wild-type endophyte that produces alkaloids associated with toxicosis). We tested for preference using goats (Capra hircus), sheep (Ovis aries), and cattle (Bos taurus). All possible pairs were tested using traditional analysis of variance as well as multidimensional scaling. Multidimensional scaling of the animal preferences indicated that two dimensions were being used to rank the hays. The first dimension for all three animal species was related to variation in forage nutritive value. The second dimension was not correlated with any of the measured variables. Endophyte status was not a factor in the preferences expressed by the three animal species. It appears that no effective feedback mechanism exists related to endophyte status.
Bibliography:http://hdl.handle.net/10113/21451
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0548
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
Cooperative investigation of the USDA‐ARS and the North Carolina ARS, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7643. The use of trade names does not imply endorsements by USDA‐ARS or by the North Carolina ARS of the products named or criticism of similar ones not mentioned.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0011-183X
1435-0653
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0548