Tensile bond strength of a flowable composite resin to ER:YAG-laser-treated dentin

Background and Objectives This in vitro study evaluated the influence of a flowable composite resin (FCR) on the tensile bond strength of resin to dentin treated with the Er:YAG Laser (L) and diamond bur (DB). Study Design/Materials and Methods Ninety dentin surfaces obtained from 45 third molars we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLasers in surgery and medicine Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 351 - 355
Main Authors Donadio-Moura, Juliana, Gouw-Soares, Sheila, de Freitas, Patricia M., Navarro, Ricardo S., Powell, Lynn G., Eduardo, Carlos de P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives This in vitro study evaluated the influence of a flowable composite resin (FCR) on the tensile bond strength of resin to dentin treated with the Er:YAG Laser (L) and diamond bur (DB). Study Design/Materials and Methods Ninety dentin surfaces obtained from 45 third molars were ground and randomly divided into six groups (n = 15): G1–DB, G2–DB+FCR, G3–L (100 mJ, 10 Hz, 37.04 J/cm2), G4–L (100 mJ, 10 Hz, 37.04 J/cm2)+FCR, G5–L (250 mJ, 2 Hz, 92.60 J/cm2), and G6–L (250 mJ, 2 Hz, 92.60 J/cm2)+FCR. After surface etching with 37% phosphoric acid and the application of an adhesive system, inverted conical specimens were prepared with a hybrid composite resin. In groups G2, G4, and G6 a FCR was placed before the hybrid composite resin. After 24 hours‐storage in distilled water, the tensile test was performed in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/minute, 500 N). Results Data were submitted to Kruskal Wallis test (P = 0.01). The mean bond strength values (MPa±SD) were: G1–13.54 (±2.99), G2–14.67 (±2.32), G3–9.49 (±3.09), G4–14.60 (±2.76), G5–8.97 (±3.89), and G6–13.02 (±2.18). Groups G1 and G2 presented the highest bond strength values, which were statistically similar to those of G4 and G6. The groups treated with laser and without the FCR (G3 and G5) showed the lowest shear bond strength values. Conclusions FCR can increase the adhesion to dentin treated with Er:YAG laser within different parameters. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:Juliana Donadio-Moura is a Trainee at the Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry; Sheila Gouw-Soares, an Assistant Professor of the Professional Master Course of Lasers in Dentistry; Patricia M. de Freitas and Ricardo S. Navarro, are the Graduate Student (PhD); Lynn G. Powell, a Professor, Assistant Dean for Dental Education; and Carlos de P. Eduardo, a Full-time Professor.
ArticleID:LSM20176
IVOCLAR/VIVADENT (Brazil)
ark:/67375/WNG-RB23TG3P-R
istex:B802137F2DE05751B6D3CEB809029B32465D6B6B
FAPESP - No. 97/10823-0
Juliana Donadio‐Moura is a Trainee at the Special Laboratory of Lasers in Dentistry; Sheila Gouw‐Soares, an Assistant Professor of the Professional Master Course of Lasers in Dentistry; Patricia M. de Freitas and Ricardo S. Navarro, are the Graduate Student (PhD); Lynn G. Powell, a Professor, Assistant Dean for Dental Education; and Carlos de P. Eduardo, a Full‐time Professor.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.20176