Small bowel obstruction, incisional hernia and survival after laparoscopic and open colonic resection (LAFA study)

Background Short‐term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium‐ to long‐term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer. Methods The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative str...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 101; no. 9; pp. 1153 - 1159
Main Authors Bartels, S. A. L., Vlug, M. S., Hollmann, M. W., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Ubbink, D. T., Cense, H. A., van Wagensveld, B. A., Engel, A. F., Gerhards, M. F., Bemelman, W. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.08.2014
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Short‐term advantages to laparoscopic surgery are well described. This study compared medium‐ to long‐term outcomes of a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open colonic resection for cancer. Methods The case notes of patients included in the LAFA study (perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care) were reviewed 2–5 years after randomization for incisional hernia, adhesional small bowel obstruction (SBO), overall survival, cancer recurrence and quality of life (QoL). The laparoscopic and open groups were compared irrespective of fast‐track or standard perioperative care. Results Data on incisional hernias, SBO, survival and recurrence were available for 399 of 400 patients: 208 laparoscopic and 191 open resections. These outcomes were corrected for duration of follow‐up. Median follow‐up was 3·4 (i.q.r. 2·6–4·4) years. Multivariable regression analysis showed that open resection was a risk factor for incisional hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2·44, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1·12 to 5·26; P = 0·022) and SBO (OR 3·70, 1·07 to 12·50; P = 0·039). There were no differences in overall survival (hazard ratio 1·10, 95 per cent c.i. 0·67 to 1·80; P = 0·730) or in cumulative incidence of recurrence (P = 0·514) between the laparoscopic and open groups. There were no measured differences in QoL in 281 respondents (P > 0·350 for all scales). Conclusion Laparoscopic colonic surgery led to fewer incisional hernia and adhesional SBO events. Registration number: NTR222 (http://www.trialregister.nl). Another score for laparoscopic surgery
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-SJQSGKJX-N
ArticleID:BJS9585
istex:49B198E4BEADEFAB9D5E4CDBDDF372DD5205D98B
Presented to the Annual Meeting of the European Society of Coloproctology, Vienna, Austria, September 2012, and United European Gastroenterology Week, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 2012
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.9585