Biological properties of acid etched titanium implants: Effect of sandblasting on bone anchorage

The SLA (sandblasted with large grit and acid etched) surface is a textured surface that has been documented to lead to a rapid and strong implant fixation. The purpose of the present study was to determine the contribution of sandblasting in addition to etching to implant anchorage. It was also aim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Vol. 68B; no. 2; pp. 149 - 159
Main Authors Szmukler-Moncler, S., Perrin, D., Ahossi, V., Magnin, G., Bernard, J. P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 15.02.2004
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The SLA (sandblasted with large grit and acid etched) surface is a textured surface that has been documented to lead to a rapid and strong implant fixation. The purpose of the present study was to determine the contribution of sandblasting in addition to etching to implant anchorage. It was also aimed to determine if the pits carved during etching alone have a bone‐interlocking capacity that leads to microanchorage between the implant and bone. SLA implants and machined‐and‐acid‐etched (MA) implants were placed in the maxilla of Land Race pigs. After 10 weeks of healing, they were reverse torqued. The reverse torque of the SLA and MA implants was 157.29 ± 38.04 N cm and 105.33 ± 25.12 N cm, respectively. Sandblasting increased bone anchorage by 49.3%; the difference was statistically significant (p = .028). Bone was found attached to both surfaces; bone ingrowth was found in the pits of both surfaces. It is suggested that the two surfaces are able to generate bone interlocking and mechanical coupling at the interface. When finite‐element modeling is performed with these surfaces, it is suggested that the bound mode be used instead of the slip mode. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 149–159, 2004
Bibliography:ArticleID:JBM20003
istex:7521EA1BAF5106C84569A2C0A438EB8D5E3FAAF0
AFI (Association Française d'Implantologie)
ark:/67375/WNG-M8RGRWKB-B
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1552-4973
1552-4981
DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.20003