Patient-Led Approaches to a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Calculator

• Published in: Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) Vol. 142; no. 4; pp. 893 - 900
• Main Authors: Rubashkin, Nicholas, Asiodu, Ifeyinwa, Vedam, Saraswathi, Sufrin, Carolyn, Adams, Vincanne
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.10.2023
• Subjects: Asian; Black or African American; Cesarean Section; Ethnicity; Female; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Indigenous Peoples; Obstetrics; Original Research; Patient Participation - methods; Pregnancy; Racial Groups; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Vaginal Birth after Cesarean; White
• ISSN: 0029-7844; 1873-233X; 1873-233X
• DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005323

A numeric probability for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) may not be highly valued or important to all patients, especially those who have strong intentions for VBAC. OBJECTIVE:To describe patient approaches to navigating their probability of a vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) within the context of prediction scores generated from the original Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units' VBAC calculator, which incorporated race and ethnicity as one of six risk factors.METHODS:We invited a diverse group of participants with a history of prior cesarean delivery to participate in interviews and have their prenatal visits recorded. Using an open-ended iterative interview guide, we queried and observed these individuals' mode-of-birth decisions in the context of their VBAC calculator scores. We used a critical and feminist approach to analyze thematic data gleaned from interview and visit transcripts.RESULTS:Among the 31 participants who enrolled, their self-identified racial and ethnic categories included: Asian or South Asian (2); Black (4); Hispanic (12); Indigenous (1); White (8); and mixed-Black, -Hispanic, or -Asian background (4). Predicted VBAC success probabilities ranged from 12% to 95%. Participants completed 64 interviews, and 14 prenatal visits were recorded. We identified four themes that demonstrated a range of patient-led approaches to interpreting the probability generated by the VBAC calculator: 1) rejecting the role of race and ethnicity; 2) reframing failure, finding success; 3) factoring the physical experience of labor; and 4) modifying the probability for VBAC.CONCLUSION:Our findings demonstrate that a numeric probability for VBAC may not be highly valued or important to all patients, especially those who have strong intentions for VBAC. Black and Hispanic participants challenged the VBAC calculator's incorporation of race and ethnicity as a risk factor and resisted the implication it produced, especially that their bodies were less capable of achieving a vaginal birth. Our findings suggest that patient-led approaches to assessing and interpreting VBAC probability may be an untapped resource for achieving a more person-centered, equitable approach to counseling.