Use of a modified Delphi approach to develop research priorities for the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Aim The modified Delphi approach is an established method for reaching a consensus opinion among a group of experts in a particular field. We have used this technique to survey the entire membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) to reach a consensus on pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inColorectal disease Vol. 16; no. 12; pp. 965 - 970
Main Authors Tiernan, J., Cook, A., Geh, I., George, B., Magill, L., Northover, J., Verjee, A., Wheeler, J., Fearnhead, N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2014
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim The modified Delphi approach is an established method for reaching a consensus opinion among a group of experts in a particular field. We have used this technique to survey the entire membership of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) to reach a consensus on prioritizing clinical research questions in colorectal disease. Method Three rounds of surveys were conducted using a web‐based tool. In the first, the ACPGBI membership was invited to submit research questions. In Rounds 2 and 3 they were asked to score questions on priority. A steering group analysed the results of each round to identify those questions ranked as being of highest priority. Results Five hundred and two questions were submitted in Round 1. Following two rounds of voting and analysis, a list of 25 priority questions was produced, including 15 cancer‐related and 10 noncancer‐related questions. Conclusion It is anticipated that these results will: (i) set the research agenda over the next few years for the study of colorectal disease in the United Kingdom, (ii) promote development and (iii) define funding of new research and prioritize areas of unmet clinical need where the potential clinical impact is greatest.
Bibliography:Bowel Disease Research Foundation
istex:1F228391F541101A43CDC9FFAC287083890E4864
ArticleID:CODI12790
ark:/67375/WNG-8THBV84P-Z
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1462-8910
1463-1318
DOI:10.1111/codi.12790