Management of Lung Nodules Detected by Volume CT Scanning
Participants who were at an increased risk for lung cancer were enrolled in a trial to determine whether CT screening reduces mortality from lung cancer. In this study, volume measurements and volume doubling times were used to evaluate the noncalcified lung nodules that were detected by CT scanning...
Saved in:
Published in | The New England journal of medicine Vol. 361; no. 23; pp. 2221 - 2229 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Waltham, MA
Massachusetts Medical Society
03.12.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Participants who were at an increased risk for lung cancer were enrolled in a trial to determine whether CT screening reduces mortality from lung cancer. In this study, volume measurements and volume doubling times were used to evaluate the noncalcified lung nodules that were detected by CT scanning at baseline and at years 1, 2, and 4 of the trial. With the use of these volumetric methods, the authors found that the chances of finding lung cancer by CT scanning 1 and 2 years after a negative baseline test were 1 in 1000 and 3 in 1000, respectively.
With the use of volumetric methods, the authors found that the chances of finding lung cancer by CT scanning 1 and 2 years after a negative baseline test were 1 in 1000 and 3 in 1000, respectively.
The use of multidetector computed tomography (CT) has increased the chance of finding noncalcified pulmonary nodules,
1
,
2
and as a result, clinicians often face the problem of deciding on the best course of action with respect to such nodules when they are found in asymptomatic subjects who have an increased risk for lung cancer.
3
This difficulty is especially evident in CT-based screening programs for lung cancer. The current practice is to refer participants in these programs for additional diagnostic evaluation if they have a noncalcified nodule that is larger than 5 mm in diameter.
4
–
9
In designing the Dutch–Belgian randomized . . . |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMoa0906085 |