Influence of selector technology on heavy metal removal by activated sludge: Secondary effects of selector technology

The purpose of this research is to compare the ability of metal removal between an aerobic selector activated sludge system and a conventional CSTR system. Metal biosorption by sludge harvested from experimental systems was determined by a series of batch experiments. Heavy metals studied in this re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWater research (Oxford) Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 971 - 976
Main Authors Su, Ming-Chien, Cha, Daniel K., Anderson, Paul R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Elsevier Ltd 1995
Elsevier Science
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this research is to compare the ability of metal removal between an aerobic selector activated sludge system and a conventional CSTR system. Metal biosorption by sludge harvested from experimental systems was determined by a series of batch experiments. Heavy metals studied in this research were zinc, cadmium and nickel. Results of experimental data revealed that metal biosorption by activated sludge was rapid; about 70% of the soluble metals in solution was removed during the first 30 min. The sorption isotherm showed that at metal equilibrium concentrations greater than 0.05 mg/l, the selector sludge had significantly higher sorption capacity than did the CSTR sludge. Metal biosorption behavior closely followed a Freudlich isotherm model for equilibrium concentrations above 0.05 mg/l. Results of the Freundlich model suggested that the adsorption capacity of sludge from the aerobic selector was significantly higher than that of the CSTR system.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0043-1354
1879-2448
DOI:10.1016/0043-1354(94)00150-6