Presentation, care, and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI according to World Bank country income classification: the ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI Registry of the European Society of Cardiology

Abstract Background The majority of NSTEMI burden resides outside high-income countries (HICs). We describe presentation, care, and outcomes of NSTEMI by country income classification. Methods and results Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes Vol. 9; no. 6; pp. 552 - 563
Main Authors Nadarajah, Ramesh, Ludman, Peter, Laroche, Cécile, Appelman, Yolande, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Budaj, Andrzej, Bueno, Hector, Huber, Kurt, Kunadian, Vijay, Leonardi, Sergio, Lettino, Maddalena, Milasinovic, Dejan, Gale, Chris P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 12.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background The majority of NSTEMI burden resides outside high-income countries (HICs). We describe presentation, care, and outcomes of NSTEMI by country income classification. Methods and results Prospective cohort study including 2947 patients with NSTEMI from 287 centres in 59 countries, stratified by World Bank country income classification. Quality of care was evaluated based on 12 guideline-recommended care interventions. The all-or-none scoring composite performance measure was used to define receipt of optimal care. Outcomes included in-hospital acute heart failure, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and death, and 30-day mortality. Patients admitted with NSTEMI in low to lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs), compared with patients in HICs, were younger, more commonly diabetic, and current smokers, but with a lower burden of other comorbidities, and 76.7% met very high risk criteria for an immediate invasive strategy. Invasive coronary angiography use increased with ascending income classification (LLMICs, 79.2%; upper middle income countries [UMICs], 83.7%; HICs, 91.0%), but overall care quality did not (≥80% of eligible interventions achieved: LLMICS, 64.8%; UMICs 69.6%; HICs 55.1%). Rates of acute heart failure (LLMICS, 21.3%; UMICs, 12.1%; HICs, 6.8%; P < 0.001), stroke/transient ischaemic attack (LLMICS: 2.5%; UMICs: 1.5%; HICs: 0.9%; P = 0.04), in-hospital mortality (LLMICS, 3.6%; UMICs: 2.8%; HICs: 1.0%; P < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (LLMICs, 4.9%; UMICs, 3.9%; HICs, 1.5%; P < 0.001) exhibited an inverse economic gradient. Conclusion Patients with NSTEMI in LLMICs present with fewer comorbidities but a more advanced stage of acute disease, and have worse outcomes compared with HICs. A cardiovascular health narrative is needed to address this inequity across economic boundaries. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract Analysis of the ACVC-EAPCI EORP NSTEMI registry stratified by country income classification.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2058-5225
2058-1742
2058-1742
DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad008