The research ethics evolution: from Nuremberg to Helsinki

Health research sets out to acquire not only theoretical knowledge but also benefits for many people and often society as a whole, and is therefore justified. The quandary, though, is how such an important, shared purpose can be pursued with full protection of individuals and communities, in particu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSouth African medical journal Vol. 104; no. 3; pp. 178 - 180
Main Author Dhai, A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published South Africa Health & Medical Publishing Group 01.03.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Health research sets out to acquire not only theoretical knowledge but also benefits for many people and often society as a whole, and is therefore justified. The quandary, though, is how such an important, shared purpose can be pursued with full protection of individuals and communities, in particular those with vulnerabilities. Abuses in the field surfaced in the early 1800s, and by the 1890s, anti-vivisectionists were calling for laws to protect children because of the increasing numbers of institutionalised children being subjected to unethical research. When read together, the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights can be interpreted as establishing a basis for underpinning the principles of free and informed consent and avoiding harms and exploitation in scientific experiments involving human participants. The Declaration of Helsinki has been recognised as one of the most authoritative statements on ethical standards for human research in the world.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0256-9574
DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.7864