Command, control and communication in bacterial pathogenesis

As recently as a few years ago, it was thought that the exchange of chemical signals between bacteria was the exception rather than the rule. A few examples of interbacterial signaling had been well described, including the bioluminescence regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Vibrio harveyi (wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTrends in microbiology (Regular ed.) Vol. 6; no. 10; pp. 382 - 383
Main Author Winans, Stephen C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.10.1998
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As recently as a few years ago, it was thought that the exchange of chemical signals between bacteria was the exception rather than the rule. A few examples of interbacterial signaling had been well described, including the bioluminescence regulatory systems of Vibrio fischeri and Vibrio harveyi (which are astonishingly dissimilar at the molecular level), the conjugal transfer system of Enterococcus faecalis, the development of multicellular fruiting bodies of Myxococcus xanthus and the production of antibiotics by Streptomyces spp. However, most other bacteria were assumed not to use intercellular signals. Furthermore, although these regulatory systems were fascinating subjects of research, none seemed terribly fundamental to human health and welfare.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0966-842X
1878-4380
DOI:10.1016/S0966-842X(98)01338-9