Negotiating Religious Differences: The Strategies of Interfaith Chaplains in Healthcare

Chaplains in healthcare increasingly work in interfaith roles with patients and families from a range of religious and spiritual backgrounds. Some move with ease between their own religious backgrounds and those of the individuals with whom they work. Others encounter tensions as their status as a p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal for the scientific study of religion Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 146 - 158
Main Authors Cadge, Wendy, Sigalow, Emily
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2013
Wiley Subscription Services
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Chaplains in healthcare increasingly work in interfaith roles with patients and families from a range of religious and spiritual backgrounds. Some move with ease between their own religious backgrounds and those of the individuals with whom they work. Others encounter tensions as their status as a person of faith comes into conflict with their status as an interfaith chaplain. We explore the two main strategies—neutralizing and code-switching—chaplains at one large academic medical center use when working with patients and families whose religious and spiritual backgrounds are different from their own. Through training in clinical pastoral education and experiences on the job, chaplains learn to neutralize (use a broad language of spirituality that emphasizes commonalities rather than differences) and to code-switch (use the languages, rituals, and practices of the people with whom they work). To the extent that the strategies evident here are present among chaplains in a broader range of institutional settings, they suggest a kind of spiritual secularism or broad approach to meaning makings that may be facilitated by interfaith chaplains in a range of settings.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-33GLP192-W
istex:F630DA371A7A62A226392987A7BD3BBFB4E115A2
ArticleID:JSSR12008
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Nancy Ammerman, Jim Beckford, Marie Cornwall, and three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this article. The primary financial support for this research was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Scholars in Health Policy Research Program and a Religious Institutions Grant from the Louisville Institute.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0021-8294
1468-5906
DOI:10.1111/jssr.12008