A retrospective cohort analysis of the Yale pediatric genomics discovery program
The Pediatric Genomics Discovery Program (PGDP) at Yale uses next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and translational research to evaluate complex patients with a wide range of phenotypes suspected to have rare genetic diseases. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 356 PGDP probands evaluated b...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of medical genetics. Part A Vol. 188; no. 10; pp. 2869 - 2878 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken, USA
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
01.10.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The Pediatric Genomics Discovery Program (PGDP) at Yale uses next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and translational research to evaluate complex patients with a wide range of phenotypes suspected to have rare genetic diseases. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 356 PGDP probands evaluated between June 2015 and July 2020, querying our database for participant demographics, clinical characteristics, NGS results, and diagnostic and research findings. The three most common phenotypes among the entire studied cohort (n = 356) were immune system abnormalities (n = 105, 29%), syndromic or multisystem disease (n = 103, 29%), and cardiovascular system abnormalities (n = 62, 17%). Of 216 patients with final classifications, 77 (36%) received new diagnoses and 139 (64%) were undiagnosed; the remaining 140 patients were still actively being investigated. Monogenetic diagnoses were found in 67 (89%); the largest group had variants in known disease genes but with new contributions such as novel variants (n = 31, 40%) or expanded phenotypes (n = 14, 18%). Finally, five PGDP diagnoses (8%) were suggestive of novel gene‐to‐phenotype relationships. A broad range of patients can benefit from single subject studies combining NGS and functional molecular analyses. All pediatric providers should consider further genetics evaluations for patients lacking precise molecular diagnoses. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding information National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: R01HD102186; Yale New Haven Hospital; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: R01HL149746 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Thierry Tremblay assisted with data analysis and critically reviewed the manuscript. E. Vincent S. Faustino provided data and statistical analyses and critically reviewed the manuscript. Nina N. Brodsky, Carrie L. Lucas, Richard Pierce, and Engin Deniz provided clinical and scientific data for the study and critically reviewed the manuscript. Yong-hui Jiang, Michele Spencer-Manzon, Allen Bale, Hui Zhang, Julie McGlynn, and James M. McGrath provided clinical data for the study and critically reviewed the manuscript. Weizhen Ji, Emily Mis, Monica Konstantino, and Cynthia Zerillo provided scientific data for the study and critically reviewed the manuscript. Samir Al-Ali and Lauren Jeffries conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed the data, and produced the manuscript. Mustafa K. Khokha conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. Saquib A. Lakhani supervised, conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated and supervised data collection, and produced the manuscript. Contributors’ Statement |
ISSN: | 1552-4825 1552-4833 1552-4833 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajmg.a.62918 |