effect of enalapril on furosemide‐activated renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in healthy dogs

Studies in our laboratory have revealed that furosemide‐induced RAAS activation, evaluated via the urine aldosterone‐to‐creatinine ratio (UAldo:C), was not attenuated by the coadministration of benazepril, while enalapril successfully suppressed amlodipine‐induced urinary aldosterone excretion. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics Vol. 38; no. 5; pp. 513 - 517
Main Authors Lantis, A. C., Ames, M. K., Werre, S., Atkins, C. E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Scientific Publications 01.10.2015
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies in our laboratory have revealed that furosemide‐induced RAAS activation, evaluated via the urine aldosterone‐to‐creatinine ratio (UAldo:C), was not attenuated by the coadministration of benazepril, while enalapril successfully suppressed amlodipine‐induced urinary aldosterone excretion. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of enalapril in suppressing ACE activity and furosemide‐induced circulating RAAS activation. Failure to do so would suggest that this failure may be a drug class effect. We hypothesized that enalapril would suppress ACE activity and furosemide‐induced circulating RAAS activation. Sixteen healthy hound dogs. The effect of furosemide (2 mg/kg PO, q12 h; Group F) and furosemide plus enalapril (0.5 mg/kg PO, q12 h; Group FE) on circulating RAAS was determined by plasma ACE activity, 4–6 h post‐treatment, and urinary A:C on days −1, −2, 1, 4, and 7. There was a significant increase in the average urine aldosterone‐to‐creatinine ratio (UAldo:C) after administration of furosemide (P < 0.05). Enalapril inhibited ACE activity (P < 0.0001) but did not significantly reduce aldosterone excretion. A significant (P < 0.05) increase in the UAldo:C was maintained for the 7 days of the study in both groups. Enalapril decreased plasma ACE activity; however, it did not suppress furosemide‐induced RAAS activation, as determined by the UAldo:C. While enalapril blunts ACE activity, the absence of circulating RAAS suppression may be due to angiotensin II reactivation, alternative RAAS pathways, and furosemide overriding concurrent ACE inhibition, all indicating the existence of aldosterone breakthrough (ABT). Along with similar findings with benazepril, it appears that failure to suppress aldosterone suppression with furosemide stimulation may be a drug class effect. The discrepancy between the current data and the documented benefits of enalapril likely reflects the efficacy of this ACE inhibitor in suppressing tissue RAAS, variable population responsiveness to ACE‐inhibition, and/or providing additional survival benefits, possibly through as yet unknown mechanisms.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.12216
ark:/67375/WNG-ZXPLQG7G-H
ArticleID:JVP12216
Veterinary Memorial Fund
istex:D4E3BDE990A97021CEAB195F3D35DAA91DD8EBFA
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0140-7783
1365-2885
DOI:10.1111/jvp.12216