A Twelve-Year Consecutive Case Experience in Thoracic Reconstruction
BACKGROUND:We describe the second largest contemporary series of flaps used in thoracic reconstruction. METHODS:A retrospective review of patients undergoing thoracomyoplasty from 2001 to 2013 was conducted. Ninety-one consecutive patients were identified. RESULTS:Thoracomyoplasty was performed for...
Saved in:
Published in | Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open Vol. 4; no. 3; p. e638 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Society of Plastic Surgeons
01.03.2016
Wolters Kluwer Health |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | BACKGROUND:We describe the second largest contemporary series of flaps used in thoracic reconstruction.
METHODS:A retrospective review of patients undergoing thoracomyoplasty from 2001 to 2013 was conducted. Ninety-one consecutive patients were identified.
RESULTS:Thoracomyoplasty was performed for 67 patients with intrathoracic indications and 24 patients with chest wall defects. Malignancy and infection were the most common indications for reconstruction (P < 0.01). The latissimus dorsi (LD), pectoralis major, and serratus anterior muscle flaps remained the workhorses of reconstruction (LD and pectoralis major64% flaps in chest wall reconstruction; LD and serratus anterior85% of flaps in intrathoracic indication). Only 12% of patients required mesh. Only 6% of patients with <2 ribs resected required mesh when compared with 24% with 3–4 ribs, and 100% with 5 or more ribs resected (P < 0.01). Increased rib resections required in chest wall reconstruction resulted in a longer hospital stay (P < 0.01). Total comorbidities and complications were related to length of stay only in intrathoracic indication (P < 0.01). Average intubation time was significantly higher in patients undergoing intrathoracic indication (5.51 days) than chest wall reconstruction (0.04 days), P < 0.05. Average hospital stay was significantly higher in patients undergoing intrathoracic indication (23 days) than chest wall reconstruction (12 days), P < 0.05. One-year survival was most poor for intrathoracic indication (59%) versus chest wall reconstruction (83%), P = 0.0048.
CONCLUSION:Thoracic reconstruction remains a safe and successful intervention that reliably treats complex and challenging problems, allowing more complex thoracic surgery problems to be salvaged. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2169-7574 2169-7574 |
DOI: | 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000603 |