Impact of rapid impulse operating disturbances on ammonia removal by trickling and submerged-upflow biofilters for intensive recirculating aquaculture

• Published in: Aquacultural engineering Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 38 - 50
• Main Authors: Lyssenko, Catherine, Wheaton, Fred
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.06.2006; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Ammonia; Animal aquaculture; Animal productions; Applied sciences; Aquaculture; bacteria; Biofilter; biofilters; Biological and medical sciences; equipment performance; Exact sciences and technology; fish culture; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; Impulse shock; Marine; Nitrification; Nitrifying bacteria; Pollution; recirculating aquaculture systems; salinity; Wastewater; wastewater treatment; Wastewaters; water temperature; Water treatment and pollution; Ammonia; Nitrifying bacteria; Nitrification; Biofilter; Wastewater; Impulse shock; Aquaculture; Recirculating flow; Bacteria; Perturbation; Waste water; Environmental engineering
• ISSN: 0144-8609; 1873-5614
• DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.08.001

Biofilters are regularly used in aquaculture production systems to remove ammonia and nitrite and are the only economically feasible ammonia removal devices in saltwater systems. Six identical 5.23L biofilters, three trickling and three submerged-upflow filters, were operated at predetermined water quality conditions (pH 7.5, temperature 25°C, salinity 5ppt, TAN 1mg/L), and then perturbed to simulate a number of possible operating disturbances, e.g. increased fish load, flushing of culture tanks, closing off of valves. Each disturbance was a controlled impulse change in ammonia concentration, temperature, pH or salinity. The maximum water quality ranges were pH 6–9, TAN 0.5–4.0mg/L, temperature 15–35°C, and salinity 0–10ppt. After each disturbance, the water quality was immediately returned to the predetermined (baseline) values. The ammonia removal across the filters was monitored during the disturbance and the recovery period for loss and subsequent restoration of biofilter removal efficiency. Baseline nitrification rates resumed within 1–2h after cessation of the shock. Some impulse shocks were temporarily detrimental to both filter types—especially low pH (−29% efficiency), low salinity (−13% to −18% efficiency), and low temperature (−11% to −13% efficiency). Raising the temperature (+9% to +12% efficiency) and TAN concentration (+0.30 to +0.36mg/L of filter additional TAN removal) appears to be beneficial to the biofilter.