Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data

Mendelian randomization refers to an analytic approach to assess the causality of an observed association between a modifiable exposure or risk factor and a clinically relevant outcome. It presents a valuable tool, especially when randomized controlled trials to examine causality are not feasible an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Society of Nephrology Vol. 27; no. 11; pp. 3253 - 3265
Main Authors Sekula, Peggy, Del Greco M, Fabiola, Pattaro, Cristian, Köttgen, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Society of Nephrology 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Mendelian randomization refers to an analytic approach to assess the causality of an observed association between a modifiable exposure or risk factor and a clinically relevant outcome. It presents a valuable tool, especially when randomized controlled trials to examine causality are not feasible and observational studies provide biased associations because of confounding or reverse causality. These issues are addressed by using genetic variants as instrumental variables for the tested exposure: the alleles of this exposure–associated genetic variant are randomly allocated and not subject to reverse causation. This, together with the wide availability of published genetic associations to screen for suitable genetic instrumental variables make Mendelian randomization a time- and cost-efficient approach and contribute to its increasing popularity for assessing and screening for potentially causal associations. An observed association between the genetic instrumental variable and the outcome supports the hypothesis that the exposure in question is causally related to the outcome. This review provides an overview of the Mendelian randomization method, addresses assumptions and implications, and includes illustrative examples. We also discuss special issues in nephrology, such as inverse risk factor associations in advanced disease, and outline opportunities to design Mendelian randomization studies around kidney function and disease.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1046-6673
1533-3450
1533-3450
DOI:10.1681/ASN.2016010098