Are liver contour and bone fusion comparable to fiducials for IGRT in liver SBRT?

• Published in: Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology Vol. 27; p. 100215
• Main Authors: de la Pinta, C., Sevillano, D., Colmenares, R., Barrio, S., Olavarria, A., Palomera, A., Romera, R., Cobos, J., Muriel, A., Fernández, E., Perna, LC, Albillos, A., Sancho, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2023; Elsevier
• Subjects: CBCT; Fiducials; Liver SBRT; SBRT; Short Communications and Technical Notes; Fiducials; Liver SBRT; SBRT; CBCT
• ISSN: 2405-6324; 2405-6324
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100215

•The use of fiducial markers in hepatic SBRT is not free of complications.•Liver contour can be used as a substitute for fiducial markers.•Bone referral is not suitable for treatment in hepatic SBRT. Liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly being used to treat tumours. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in patient positioning when using implanted fiducials as surrogates compared to alternative methods based on liver contour or bone registration. Eighteen patients treated with SBRT who underwent a fiducial placement procedure were included. Fiducial guidance was our gold standard to guide treatment in this study. After recording the displacements, when fusing the planning CT and CBCT performed in the treatment unit using fiducials, liver contour and bone reference, the differences between fiducials and liver contour and bone reference were calculated. Data from 88 CBCT were analyzed. The correlation between the displacements found with fiducials and those performed based on the liver contour and the nearest bone structure as references was determined. The mean, median, variance, range and standard deviation of the displacements with each of the fusion methods were obtained. μ, Ʃ, and σ values and margins were obtained. Lateral displacements of less than 3 mm with respect to the gold standard in 92% vs. 62.5% of cases using liver contour and bone references, respectively, with 93.2% vs. 65.9% in the AP axis and SI movement in 69.3% vs. 51.1%. The errors μ, σ and Ʃ of the fusions with hepatic contour and bone reference in SI were 0.26 mm, 4 mm and 3 mm, and 0.8 mm, 5 mm and 3 mm respectively. Our study showed that displacements were smaller with the use of hepatic contour compared to bone reference and comparable to those obtained with the use of fiducials in the lateral, AP and SI motion axes. This would justify that hepatic contouring can be a guide in the treatment of patients in the absence of fiducials.