Discrepancies between Expected and Actual Implementation: The Process Evaluation of PERS Integration in Nursing Homes

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 17; no. 12; p. 4245
• Main Authors: Chang, Fangyuan, Eriksson, Andrea, Östlund, Britt
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 14.06.2020; MDPI
• Subjects: Adult; Data collection; Domestication; Emergency preparedness; Emergency response; Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; New technology; Nurses; Nursing Homes; Procurement; Questionnaires; Studies; Sweden; Sweden; process evaluation; health technology services; care practices; nursing homes; Personal emergency response system; implementation
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17124245

Recent studies prove that when implementing new technology technology-driven and one-size-fits-all approaches are problematic. This study focuses on the process of implementing personal emergency response system (PERS) at nursing homes. The aim is to understand why the implementation of PERS has not met initial expectations. Multiple methods were used in two Swedish nursing homes, including document analysis, questionnaires ( = 42), participant observation (67 h), and individual interviews ( = 12). A logic model was used to ascertain the discrepancies that emerged between expected and actual implementation, and the domestication theory was used to discuss the underlying meanings of the discrepancies. The discrepancies primarily focused on staff competence, system readiness, work routines, and implementation duration. Corresponding reasons were largely relevant to management issues regarding training, the procurement systems, individual and collective responsibilities as well as invisible work. The uptake of technology in daily practice is far more nuanced than a technology implementation plan might imply. We point out the importance of preparing for implementation, adjusting to new practices, and leaving space and time for facilitating implementation. The findings will be of use to implementers, service providers, and organizational managers to evaluate various measures in the implementation process, enabling them to perform technology implementation faster and more efficiently.